This political season was nasty. Name calling, false accusations, and
fact-free assertions ran rampant across the interwebs. As a long-time political junkie, I found this
trend particularly disheartening. I love
a hot-blooded political fight as much as the next guy, but I also love shaking
hands afterwards. Social media has drawn
more people into the political process, which is great because involvement
makes the whole system thrive. However, if
social media is the new venue for political discourse, let’s lay down some
ground rules.
1) No name calling. Insulting your fellow Americans by calling
them crazy, uninformed, stupid, sheep, wackos, and even Nazis simply because they
share different beliefs than you is disrespectful and unnecessary. Petty name-calling weakens your argument. Save it for the playground.
2) No generalizing. All Republicans don’t believe the same
thing, nor do Democrats adhere to the same beliefs. Each of us comes to the political fray with personal
experiences that shape our world view.
Respect your opponent’s life experience by NOT putting them in a box.
3) Separate politics and religion. The internet is not a bar, so politics
and religion are up for discussion, but they are two separate debates. All conservatives are not Christian and all
liberals are not Jews. In a political
debate, attacking another person’s faith, especially in a country whose
Constitution guarantees both a secular government and religious freedom, accomplishes nothing. In politics, religion is a non-issue.
4) Check your facts. Nothing ruins a great debate like a lie,
half-truth, or a fabricated talking point.
Before you enflame your opponent with the morning’s latest accusation or
something you read in an email, run it through one of the many unbiased online fact-checking
machines. Factcheck.org, politifact.org,
Wikipedia.org, and national newspapers (excluding the opinion pages) may
support or disprove your assertion. If
it checks out, use it. If your assertion
is false or mostly false, you may want to re-evaluate your position. Facts are facts. False declarations are lies. Something that you think ought to be true,
but is proven untrue, has no place in honest discourse.
5) Facts are facts. If you struggle to prove your point based
on the facts you are finding, consider that perhaps the facts are correct and
you need to modify your position. It’s
OK to change and grow, even as an adult!
Avoid criticizing the source of the facts, as well. Finding a fact distributed by the
Congressional Budget Office or the Bureau of Labor Statistics that disproves your
assertion is a red flag – you may be wrong.
Admit it, adapt, and move on. You’ll
find peace.
6) Cite non-partisan news sources. Rush’s point about global warming being
caused by sheep farts in New Zealand might be factually spot-on, but there’s a
pretty good chance your liberal opponent thinks Rush is a pompous gas bag. If Mr. Limbaugh’s facts are correct, you will
be able to find them in an unbiased source.
Factcheck.org, politifact.org, Wikipedia.org, and national newspapers
(excluding the opinion pages) are great sources for information. MSNBC, FOX News, Huffington Post, Daily KOS,
and Andrew Breitbart are biased and sometimes opinion-based sources. Remember that, although the information from
these outlets may be factually true, we are living in a time when the media has
lost objective credibility. In many
cases, the line between real news and entertainment is hopelessly blurred. Respect your opponent’s skepticism of
political news sources and simply avoid them. Cite your facts from unbiased sources and you’ll
enjoy hard-won credibility. As a
credible source, you’re more likely to sway your opponent to see your point of
view more clearly.
7) Avoid the “They’re all the same” trap. All politicians are not sleazebags and
all political parties differ. If you are
unclear about the positions of the various political parties, and how they
differ, I encourage you to investigate their websites and read the entire party
platform. Democrats, the American
Communist Party, Republicans, the Green Party, and Libertarians are all
different. Accusing them of all “being
the same” does a great disservice to those who serve our country honestly and
hold fast to their principles.
8) Learn the terminology. Learn the difference between a political
system and an economic system.
9) Keep it in perspective. When emphasizing the scale of an alleged
scandal, refrain from quantifying it as “the biggest in history”, as in “This
fiasco is the biggest in history.” Pearl
Harbor, the Holocaust, September 11, and the Khmer Rouge are what you’re up
against. A politician makes a
closed-door deal with a company he used to run?
Definitely lacks scruples, but not the worst move in history. Keep it in perspective.
10) Hitler was Hitler. No current leaders come close to reviving the
atrocities of Hitler. If you compare any
current world leader to Hitler, you lose the entire argument. If your opponent compares any current world
leader to Hitler, congratulations, you win!
Discussion over, log off, go outside.
There you have it!
Adhering to these rules of engagement ensure respectful online political
discourse. If you choose to engage, be
prepared to learn, bend, grow, and change.
This is how we can mend the massive chasm between the left and
right. We must respect each other first. Remember that the words you type are read by
somebody just like you, sitting in front of the screen looking for a
connection, trying to sort out something in the midst of work, parenting,
homework, hobbies, and a dream of something better. Be a part of it. Be a part of making it better, smarter, and
more respectful for everybody.
Really great points made Natalie, well written and thorough. My favorite points are #3 and #9.I have a few reflections:
ReplyDelete1. My take on the social media political disucssion phenomena can be summed up by the phrase, "facebook courage". Online, separated by screen, wires, and miles, people can spew things (especially with the name-calling) they are too cowardly to say to your face.
2. Point #10 (Hitler name calling).... I don't know. There are some pretty heinous things going on in some other countries in the name of ethnic cleansing and population control. I would argue that the lack of human rights afforded to the Chinese people at the hands of their own government is worthy of arguing your point #10. Specifically, while between approximately 6 and 10 million Jews are estimated to have been killed during the WWII Holocaust, the number of Chinese children forced to be aborted by their own government in enforcement of China's "one child policy" numbers AT LEAST in the several 100s of millions. I am not trying to one-up anyone's suffering. But holocausts are occurring, and a spade should be called a spade, or a Hitler a Hitler if you will. http://abcnews.go.com/International/forced-abortion-china-prompts-apology-officials-suspended/story?id=16579517